1813 to 1880 Baptism Project Castle Acre St James |
Baptisms 1813 to 1880
The parish of Castle Acre lies in western central
Norfolk roughly 4 miles north of the market town of Swaffham.
Castle Acre sits just west of the A1065 road which links
Swaffham with Fakenham and which sits on the northern banks of
the River Nar. Castle Acre has an ancient history, believed to
have been a Roman station sitting on the line of the Roman road
linking Thetford and the coastal station at Brancaster, the site
was chosen by the Norman knight William Warren as the base for
his operations in the country establishing the castle, described
by Pevsner as "one of the grandest motte-and-bailey castles in
England". A castle is mentioned as early as 1085 in documents
but was probably begun in the 1070s. Castle Acre's status as
centre was enhanced further in 1090 when it became the site of a
Cluniac Priory, subsidiary to Lewes in Sussex, which dominates
the western end of the village with ruined cruciform church and
extensive cloisters. Castle Acre is almost of sufficient size as
to have become a market town but its proximity to that at
Swaffham probably prevented such. Like most Norfolk parishes the
wider and rather extensive parish of over 3,200 acres was almost
entirely devoted to arable farming, the Nar valley providing
some riverside pastures by way of variation. Today the
antiquities and the presence of the Peddars' Way & North
Norfolk Coastal National Trail which passes through the village
provide a steady stream of tourists to its attractive large
village green surrounded by lively inns and cafes. |
|
Two standard 1600-entry register books cover
the period of this transcript, the first running to 1856 is filmed
in Microfilm MF1711, the second which runs onward to completion in
the early 21st century is a later deposit and filmed on Microfilm
MFRO686. In addition to these legacy resources digitised images
are available of the 1st register freely on Familysearch and both
registers on most of the commercial sites for those with
appropriate subscriptions. It must be said that there are issues
with the registers, unused pages have been ripped from the earlier
register and for 4 years between 1869 & 1873 the second
register is deficient. As there are no compensatory BTs for that
period one must assume that entries have been lost to history. The
clerical standard is poor in places with many marginal entries of
accidental omissions, out-of-date entries similarly omitted,
incomplete dating and strange anomalies such as in spelling of
given names and also a mother listed as "William" on one occasion,
a poor clerical effort indeed. |
Back 1815 1820 1825 1830 1835 1840 1845 1850 1855 1860 1865 1870 1875 1880
Back 1815 1820
1825 1830 1835
1840 1845
1850 1855
1860 1865
1870 1875
1880
Corrections to Tinstaafl
Transcripts